Twitter
Flickr
FacebookFriday, August 25, 2006
The age of designvertising.
Just in case the division still exists, we'd like to put an end to the false separation of design and advertising. In our minds, the two are inseparable. Advertising is design. And all design is, in a way, advertising.
These days, designers are just as involved in concept as any other department of an agency, including media. The best designers are no longer perceived as cake decorators who come in at the end of a campaign execution to make something look pretty. And on the advertising side of the equation, art directors and writers should be expected to have a certain aesthetic knowledge of what a brand should look and feel like, beyond the conventional advertising deliverables of print, TV, collateral and interactive.
Advertising vs. design is dead. Long live designvertising. Or, if you prefer, adversigning.
Posted by 3 at 04:42 PM | Post a comment
Friday, August 18, 2006
When guerrilla goes gack.
We're always trying to one-up our clients’ competitors with guerrilla tactics
that surprise and reward, with the goal of introducing our clients to those we
are targeting. But we are often struck by the lack of separation in people's minds between fresh new tactics and gack - the annoying advertising for advertising sake - or what some have called “ad creep.”
So, these are a few guidelines we use to determine if an idea is worthy
of pursuit:
If it annoys people, it's gack. If it entertains, it's fresh.
If it's pasting a logo on something (escalators, elevator buttons, cups, etc.), it's probably gack. If people stop and look at it, it's fresh.
If it adds to people's loathing of advertising in general, it's gack. If they don't even think of it as advertising, it's fresh.
If the audience is captive and can’t escape the message, it might be gack. If the audience feels like they are stumbling upon it, it’s fresh.
If the guerrilla message isn’t customized for the location, it could be gack. If the message couldn’t work without the location, it’s fresh.
Posted by 3 at 05:10 PM | Post a comment
Wednesday, August 9, 2006
It’s all in the name.
At some point in the past decade, advertising agencies stopped wanting to be advertising agencies. Is it because, as an industry, we’re embarrassed? Maybe it’s the bad connotation people associate with “ad people” being slick or self-serving. Perhaps it’s the self-perception that because “advertising” is changing, clients will think advertising agencies are limited to traditional advertising. Who knows. But whatever the reason, ad agencies have taken to calling themselves “brand consultants” or some other euphemism meant to imply greater credibility.
To us, a good ad agency is a good ad agency and should be able to handle anything. The solid agencies adapt, adjust, understand new media, create their own media for clients and help their clients rock and roll through the constant changes in communications.
We’re an ad agency. Hi.
Posted by 3 at 10:16 AM | Post a comment
Page 13 of 14 pages « First < 11 12 13 14 >
Latest work:
Albuquerque Ambulance
SEARCH BLOG
RECENT BLOG ENTRIES
BLOG ARCHIVES
January 2012August 2011
April 2011
December 2010
October 2010
August 2010
June 2010
January 2010
October 2009
September 2009
June 2009
May 2009
February 2009
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
August 2007
COOL LINKS
Ad RantsAdvertising Age
Adweek
AIGA
Albuquerque The Magazine
Alone and Unafraid
Communication Arts
Coupe Magazine
D&AD
David Shrigley
Design Observer
Duke City Fix
Eye Magazine
Fallon Planning Blog
Fubiz
Grain Edit
Graphis
Identity Archives
Logo Lounge
Mark Bixby
MediaGirl
NM Business Weekly
Swiss Legacy
The Eisner American Museum of Advertising and Design
The One Club
The Type Directors Club
The Visual Dictionary